Note Taker	Øyvind Aassve
Participants	Anthony B. Coates, Mark Crawford, Scott Hinkelman

Agenda

1. - Welcome
2. - Agree on agenda
3. - Select note taker
4. - Review Open Action Items
5. - Discuss requirement comments and work these into the requirements documentation.
   We have received comments from SAP (see dublin minutes), ibm (see ucm confluence) and gs1.
6. - Other business
   Do we have and should we have a problem statement with regard to the current methodology so that everybody agrees on the lessons we have learnt from experiences until today?
7. - Next meeting

Meeting Results

1. - Review Open Action Items
2. - Discuss requirement comments and work these into the requirements documentation.
   In order to facilitate the process it was suggested that one person performes an editing process where all comments is put into the main document. Tony volunteered to do this.
3. UCM Scope
   There was by several participants expressed a need to revisit the scope and charter of the UCM Project Proposal. There seem to some different opinions on where and how far to go. Everybody agrees that the scope of the current context driver mechanism should be the reference point, but while some mean we just need to tweak it a little others see need for major changes. As the scope will influence the requirements it is suggested that the scope discussion is cleared before going through the updated requirements. It is also important to check what kind of participations is needed to change the scope and the consequences of changing them. Oyvind contacts Gunther.
4. Need for listserv
   There is a need for a listserv that can provide a public archive of all e-mail-discussions. The current UNCEFACT system does no allow that for individual projects. It was therefore suggested that we establish a Yahoo-group for recording this. It should be open to the public for transpearancy but only grant comment rights to approved members. Oyvind will set up the group.  
5. Do we have and should we have a problem statement with regard to the current methodology so that everybody agrees on the lessons we have learnt from experiences until today?
   There are a number of comments that has come in the CCTS review that relates to issues regarding context. Mark volunteered to extract these and make available for the context group. 
6. - Next meeting

Action Items

 Tony - edits all comments into the main requirement document.

 Mark - extract all CCTS comments regarding context and makes the document available to the group.

 Oyvind - establish Yahoo-group listserv after clearing this with TMG Chair; check changes of scope effects with Gunter.

Next Meetings

As Tony is soon leaving for vacation while also being responsible for putting togheter the document we will have the next meeting in ONE week in stead of two.